Remy Peptides · For in-vitro laboratory research only. Not for human or veterinary use.Research Use Only
Update History ▾
May 27, 2026: Initial publication with HCG glycoprotein review, recombinant-vs-urinary differentiation, Esteves Reprod Med Biol 2026 APHRODITE-NOA review, Smit/Verdegaal/Bond F&S Reports 2025 post-androgen spermatogenesis recovery, and the six-year BPCIA-driven U.S. shortage context.
Research-use-only framing applied throughout in line with Remy editorial standards.
TL;DR — Research Summary

HCG is a placental heterodimeric glycoprotein that drives Leydig-cell testosterone and ovarian steroidogenesis through the LH/CG receptor, and its 2026 research-reference status is dominated by two facts: the published fertility evidence base has matured, and the U.S. supply chain has been broken for six years. Esteves and colleagues introduced the APHRODITE criteria (Reprod Biomed Online, 2024), applied in a 2026 review to stratify men with non-obstructive azoospermia who may respond to HCG-based gonadotropin protocols.[1] Smit, Verdegaal, and Bond et al. (F&S Reports, 2025) reported real-world spermatogenesis recovery in men presenting after non-prescribed androgen use.[2] Against that clinical signal, the March 23, 2020 BPCIA reclassification of HCG from drug to biologic has now entered its sixth consecutive year of FDA shortage status in 2026: Pregnyl and Novarel are intermittent, generic urinary-derived HCG is largely absent, and Ovidrel (recombinant choriogonadotropin alfa) is the most stable product on the market.[3]

Compliance note: this article is an endocrinology research reference, not a treatment guide. HCG has approved human fertility indications in multiple jurisdictions; nothing on this page is human-use dosing, fertility-treatment guidance, or veterinary-use instruction. Remy Peptides publishes peptide research; it supplies no compounds. HCG is described here in research-reference IU format for in-vitro laboratory context only.

What Is HCG?

Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) is a heterodimeric glycoprotein hormone produced by the syncytiotrophoblast of the placenta during pregnancy. Structurally it consists of a 92-amino-acid alpha subunit — shared identically with luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) — non-covalently associated with a 145-amino-acid beta subunit that carries the hormone-specific information.[4] The mature heterodimer is roughly 36-40 kDa depending on glycosylation, with up to eight N- and O-linked carbohydrate side chains. Those chains are not decorative: they extend circulating half-life relative to LH and they modulate receptor signalling bias.

The beta-HCG subunit shares approximately 80% sequence homology with the LH beta subunit, with a unique C-terminal peptide extension of 24 amino acids carrying additional O-linked glycans. That homology is the reason HCG and LH both engage the same receptor on the gonadal cell surface — and the reason a beta-HCG immunoassay is the diagnostic backbone of pregnancy testing in clinical chemistry. For research-reference purposes, the practical consequence is that HCG behaves as a long-acting LH agonist with greater receptor occupancy than endogenous LH at equivalent molar concentrations.

Unlike short peptides such as KPV or growth-hormone-axis molecules like the CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin blend, HCG is not gravimetrically quantified for research handling. It is measured in international units (IU) calibrated against the WHO 5th International Standard for Chorionic Gonadotropin (NIBSC 07/364), because biological potency depends on glycosylation and the presence or absence of nicked subunits, not simply on peptide mass.[5]

Mechanism: LH/CG Receptor Activation & Downstream Steroidogenesis

HCG and LH share a single receptor — the LH/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) — a class A G-protein-coupled receptor with a large extracellular leucine-rich repeat domain that binds the heterodimeric hormone with sub-nanomolar affinity. The receptor is expressed primarily on Leydig cells in the male testis and on theca and granulosa cells in the female ovary, with smaller populations described in the uterus, placenta, and fetal tissues.[4]

The canonical signalling cascade is well characterised:

A practical research-reference point: HCG's pharmacokinetic profile — circulating half-life of roughly 24-36 hours after intramuscular administration of urinary-derived product, compared to LH's roughly 20-minute half-life — is the reason single-dose HCG protocols are used to mimic an LH surge in fertility research, and why repeat-dose protocols produce sustained Leydig-cell stimulation rather than the pulsatile pattern that endogenous LH provides.

Recombinant vs Urinary-Derived HCG: Pregnyl, Novarel, Ovidrel

Three product lines dominate the global HCG supply, and the differences matter for research-reference comparability.

Product Sponsor Source Format 2026 availability
Pregnyl Organon Urinary (extracted from pregnant women's urine) 5,000 IU and 10,000 IU lyophilized vials with diluent Intermittent; reactivations and re-shortages cycle through the year
Novarel Ferring Urinary (extracted from pregnant women's urine) 10,000 IU multidose lyophilized vials Intermittent; reported in shortage status across most of 2025-2026
Ovidrel (choriogonadotropin alfa) EMD Serono Recombinant CHO-cell expression 250 mcg pre-filled syringe (~6,500 IU equivalent) Most consistently available HCG product in 2026
Generic urinary HCG Multiple compounders (pre-2020) Urinary Various lyophilized formats, historically including 5,000 IU Largely absent from the U.S. market since BPCIA reclassification

The biological case for recombinant choriogonadotropin alfa (Ovidrel) is straightforward: a defined CHO-cell expression system produces a more homogeneous glycoform population than urine-extracted material, with batch-to-batch variability constrained by manufacturing controls rather than donor urine composition. The trade-off is that the 250 mcg pre-filled syringe is a fixed, non-divisible unit, which constrains protocol flexibility relative to a reconstitutable lyophilized vial.

For research-reference comparability, the urinary-derived products carry a heterogeneous glycoform mix that includes nicked and hyperglycosylated species; this heterogeneity is exactly what the IU-based potency standard exists to control. Equating "5,000 IU urinary HCG" with "5,000 IU recombinant HCG" on the basis of label alone, without bioassay-anchored equivalence, is the classic error in cross-product research design.

Fertility Research Applications & the APHRODITE Criteria (Andrology 2026)

HCG's most extensively studied research application is male infertility, specifically the management of secondary hypogonadism and the stratification of men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) who may benefit from gonadotropin-based fertility therapy. Esteves and colleagues introduced the APHRODITE criteria — Andrological Phenotypic Reproductive Outcomes after DIagnostic Testing and Endocrinological evaluation — in Reprod Biomed Online (2024), and a 2026 review in Reproductive Medicine and Biology applies them as a stratification framework for NOA.[1]

The framework formalises a separation that has long been informal in andrology practice: men whose azoospermia reflects insufficient pituitary drive (secondary hypogonadism, characterised by low FSH, low or low-normal LH, low testosterone, and preserved testicular volume) versus men whose azoospermia reflects primary testicular failure (elevated FSH, elevated LH, low testosterone, and reduced testicular volume). The first group is the subset in which HCG and HCG + recombinant FSH protocols have the strongest published response signal; the second group has a markedly weaker response and benefits more from surgical sperm-retrieval pathways.

Esteves et al. argue that explicit APHRODITE stratification at intake reduces the long-standing problem of mixed-aetiology NOA cohorts in published trials, where outcome variance has been inflated by including patients with very different underlying pathology. For research-reference purposes, this is the most important methodological development in HCG fertility research in the current cycle: future trial data and meta-analyses are likely to report results within APHRODITE strata rather than across an undifferentiated NOA population.[1]

Adjacent endocrine-axis research-reference material on this site covers tesamorelin (GHRH analog) and the CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin GH-secretagogue blend as separate hypothalamic-pituitary axes; HCG sits on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and is not interchangeable with growth-hormone-axis tools.

Post-Androgen Spermatogenesis Recovery — Smit et al. 2025

A second 2020s-era data stream centres on men presenting with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia following non-prescribed androgen use. Exogenous androgen suppresses hypothalamic GnRH, collapsing pituitary LH and FSH output and, secondarily, intratesticular testosterone and spermatogenesis. Recovery after discontinuation is variable and often incomplete; HCG-based protocols are the most-published pharmacological intervention in this space.

Smit, Verdegaal, and Bond and colleagues reported a retrospective real-world cohort in F&S Reports (2025) describing HCG-based regimens in men presenting to a fertility clinic following non-prescribed androgen use. The cohort reported a meaningful proportion of patients achieving spermatogenesis recovery on HCG or HCG-plus-recombinant-FSH protocols, with recovery time varying with baseline testicular volume and duration of prior androgen exposure.[2]

Two interpretive cautions apply for a research-reference reader. First, retrospective fertility-clinic cohorts select for a population motivated to recover fertility — generalisation to all post-androgen presentations is unsupported. Second, the published data describe outcomes inside a regulated clinical setting; nothing in the published paper supports a self-administered "post-cycle" framing, and Remy Peptides does not provide such framing on any research page.

The honest summary across the published record is consistent: HCG has reproducible mechanistic and clinical evidence in fertility research, with the strongest signal in well-stratified secondary-hypogonadism and post-androgen-suppression populations. It is not framed here for human use.

U.S. Supply Status & the BPCIA Reclassification

The single most consequential regulatory event in modern HCG supply is the March 23, 2020 reclassification of HCG from a small-molecule drug to a biologic under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). The reclassification was part of a broader FDA "deemed to be a license" transition that moved a defined set of protein products — including HCG, insulin, and others — from the 505(b) drug pathway to the 351(a) biologics pathway. The intent was regulatory rationalisation; the supply consequence was severe.[3]

Three downstream effects defined the post-2020 HCG market:

For research-reference purposes, the U.S. regulatory situation is informational rather than directly governing — research-use chorionic gonadotropin supply is independent of FDA shortage designations — but the global manufacturing concentration created by the BPCIA transition affects upstream availability of urinary-derived material worldwide. For anyone documenting HCG in a research-reference context, the practical consequence is that upstream availability of urinary-derived material is structurally intermittent, and that intermittency is an input to any laboratory record, not a temporary condition.

Reconstitution & Storage Protocol

HCG handling follows the standard lyophilized-glycoprotein research-reference protocol, with one critical convention that separates it from most other peptides in this library.

1. IU measurement, not mg

All reconstitution math for HCG should be done in international units, not milligrams. The label on a 5,000 IU vial is the bioassay-anchored unit; converting to a milligram or microgram equivalent for protocol design is the wrong abstraction and reliably produces cross-product mismatches. A short discussion of unit conversion sits in the reconstitution calculator for the molecules that do use mg labelling; HCG is intentionally not represented there in mg form for this reason.

2. Bacteriostatic water reconstitution

Lyophilized HCG is typically reconstituted with bacteriostatic water (0.9% benzyl alcohol in sterile water) for research-reference purposes. The volume of diluent determines the resulting IU/mL concentration: 1 mL of bacteriostatic water added to a 5,000 IU vial yields 5,000 IU/mL; 5 mL yields 1,000 IU/mL. Vial mixing should be by gentle swirling, never vortexing, to avoid mechanical denaturation of the glycoprotein.

3. Cold-chain after reconstitution

Reconstituted HCG is unstable at room temperature and should be stored at 2-8°C with use within roughly 30-60 days of reconstitution depending on diluent and vial integrity. Lyophilized HCG, by contrast, is significantly more stable: published manufacturer data support multi-year stability for properly sealed lyophilized vials under refrigeration. Lyophilized research-reference vials are documented against the same cold-chain practice recorded across the COA library.

4. Glycoprotein-specific handling

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles degrade glycoprotein activity disproportionately to peptide bond cleavage — alpha/beta subunit dissociation is the dominant failure mode, and a reconstituted HCG solution that has been frozen and thawed once should be treated as having reduced potency even if no visible precipitation has occurred. Single-use aliquoting at reconstitution is the standard research-reference practice for this reason.

HCG Research-Reference Format and Its Supply Context

The research-reference format for HCG is an IU-keyed lyophilized chorionic gonadotropin vial, conventionally 5,000 IU, handled under cold chain and documented strictly for in-vitro research use only. The IU labelling is the important part: unlike most compounds covered in this library, HCG is bioassay-anchored rather than mass-anchored, so a research record that converts it to milligrams has already lost the meaning of the number.

Availability of urinary-derived material has been structurally intermittent worldwide since the 2020 BPCIA reclassification described above. That is upstream of any single source, and it is the reason published availability statements for chorionic gonadotropin should be read with more scepticism than for a synthetic peptide of comparable size.

Adjacent endocrine-axis research-reference compounds include the CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin GH-secretagogue blend and the tesamorelin GHRH analog; both sit on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis but neither is an analogue of HCG, which acts on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis through the LH receptor.

For handling and documentation context, see the COA library for the published batch-evidence pattern used across this site, and the reconstitution calculator for the broader peptide-handling tooling.

Our Research Standards

This article prioritises primary clinical literature, peer-reviewed expert reviews, and FDA regulatory records. Where the human clinical record is thin or supply data is moving, we say so directly. No therapeutic, human-use, or veterinary-use claim is made here; HCG is covered as an IU-keyed research-reference format only. Read our editorial policy →

RP
Editorial Review

Editorial Board, Remy Peptides

The Remy Peptides Editorial Board reviews Remy's peptide research library, with a focus on analytical verification, clinical-trial interpretation, and compliance-safe scientific communication.

About the editorial team →

HCG Research FAQ

What is HCG?

Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) is a heterodimeric glycoprotein hormone composed of a non-covalently bound alpha subunit (shared with LH, FSH, and TSH) and a unique beta subunit. It is produced by the syncytiotrophoblast of the placenta during pregnancy and acts on the LH/CG receptor on Leydig cells in males and theca and granulosa cells in females.[4]

Why is HCG measured in IU instead of milligrams?

HCG is a heterogeneous glycoprotein whose biological activity depends on glycosylation pattern and degree of nicking, not just peptide mass. The international unit (IU), defined against the WHO 5th International Standard for Chorionic Gonadotropin (NIBSC 07/364), was adopted because it ties potency to bioassay rather than gravimetric content. A 5,000 IU vial of urinary-derived HCG is not interchangeable on a mg basis with a recombinant product.[5]

What is the difference between Pregnyl, Novarel, and Ovidrel?

Pregnyl (Organon) and Novarel (Ferring) are urinary-derived HCG products extracted from the urine of pregnant women. Ovidrel (choriogonadotropin alfa, EMD Serono) is a recombinant HCG produced in CHO cells and supplied as a 250 mcg pre-filled syringe approximately bioequivalent to 6,500 IU. Ovidrel has remained the most consistently available HCG product through the FDA shortage.[3]

What are the APHRODITE criteria?

APHRODITE (Andrological Phenotypic Reproductive Outcomes after DIagnostic Testing and Endocrinological evaluation) is a stratification framework introduced by Esteves and colleagues (Reprod Biomed Online, 2024) and applied in a 2026 review to evaluating men with non-obstructive azoospermia who may benefit from HCG-based gonadotropin therapy. It separates secondary hypogonadism from primary testicular failure based on FSH, LH, total testosterone, and testicular volume, and identifies the subset most likely to respond to HCG or HCG + recombinant FSH protocols in fertility research.[1]

Does HCG help restore spermatogenesis after androgen use?

Smit, Verdegaal, and Bond et al. published a 2025 retrospective cohort in F&S Reports showing that HCG-based protocols restored spermatogenesis in a meaningful proportion of men presenting with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia following non-prescribed androgen use. This is real-world evidence from a fertility-clinic population and does not constitute a Remy Peptides clinical recommendation; the research finding is reported here for endocrinology research-reference context only.[2]

Why has HCG been on the FDA shortage list since 2020?

On March 23, 2020, the FDA reclassified HCG from a small-molecule drug to a biologic under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). The transition forced legacy urinary-derived HCG products to re-enter the regulatory pipeline as biologics, restricted 503A compounding pharmacy access, and concentrated supply on a small number of approved manufacturers. As of 2026, HCG has now been on the FDA Drug Shortage List for six consecutive years, with Pregnyl and Novarel intermittently available and Ovidrel (recombinant) the most stable supply.[3]

Why is chorionic gonadotropin supply so intermittent?

Because the 2020 BPCIA reclassification moved HCG onto the biologics pathway, which removed 503A compounding access and concentrated approved supply on a small number of manufacturers. Urinary-derived products have cycled through shortage and reactivation every year since, and recombinant choriogonadotropin alfa has been the most stable approved supply through the period. The intermittency is upstream and structural, not local.

Sources

  1. Esteves SC. Hormonal Therapy Before Sperm Retrieval in Men With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: From Controversy to Precision Using the APHRODITE Criteria. Reprod Med Biol. 2026. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.70080
  2. Smit DL, Verdegaal EL, Bond P, et al. Recovery of spermatogenesis in men with anabolic androgenic steroid-induced azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia treated with human chorionic gonadotropin: a retrospective real-world cohort. F&S Reports. 2025. Summary & supply-status context: HCG FDA-approved shortage 2026 reference
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Shortages Database — Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) listings; Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) "deemed to be a license" transition, effective March 23, 2020. accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/drugshortages
  4. Cole LA. Biological functions of hCG and hCG-related molecules. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:102. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-102 · PMID: 20735820
  5. National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC). WHO 5th International Standard for Chorionic Gonadotrophin, NIBSC code 07/364. nibsc.org/products/07/364

For adjacent endocrine-axis references, continue to the tesamorelin GHRH analog review and the CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin blend guide.